Ex parte SAWAGATA - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-2855                                                          
          Application 08/075,338                                                      


               memory means having a plurality of storage areas for                   
          storing a respective plurality of frames of the video signals               
          sequentially reproduced from said recording medium;                         
               second reproducing means for reproducing the time code                 
          signal from said recording medium;                                          
               time code comparing means for comparing the time code                  
          signal reproduced by said second reproducing means with the                 
          reference time code signal supplied from outside, thereby                   
          generating a control signal; and                                            
               reading control means for controlling said memory means                
          and selectively and sequentially reading frames of the video                
          signal one after another from only one storage area of said                 
          memory means in accordance with the control signal so that the              
          time code signal corresponding to the frame of the video signal             
          read from said one storage area of said memory means is                     
          synchronized with the reference time code signal.                           
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Ichinose                      4,612,569           Sep. 16, 1986             
          Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                     
          paragraph, as being based on an inadequate disclosure.  Claims 1-           
          11 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of               
          obviousness the examiner offers Ichinose taken alone.                       
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answers for the           
          respective details thereof.                                                 
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner, the arguments in           

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007