Ex parte MITCHELL et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 95-2917                                                            
          Application 08/082,895                                                        


               Appellants argue on page 16 of the brief that none of the                
          references teach or suggest controlling a specific amount of                  
          flux density at the magnetoresistive element during writing or                
          controlling the amount of flux from the write head to the                     
          magnetoresistive element during reading.  We note that                        
          independent claim 1 recites "the flux density at said MRE                     
          during writing being equal to or less than about 10,000 gauss,                
          whereby destabilization of the said MRE when writing with said                
          write head is prevented" and the other independent claim 16                   
          recites "the flux communicated to the MRE via said write head                 
          when reading with said read head, resulting in about 10                       
          percent or less of the signal output of said MRE."                            
               The Examiner responded on page 6 of the answer that the                  
          Examiner's modifications would have inherently resulted in                    
          flux densities at the MRE during writing of less than 6000                    
          gauss and flux communicated to the MRE via the write head                     
          during the reading of about 10 per cent of the signal output                  
          of the MRE.                                                                   






                                           8                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007