Appeal No. 95-2917
Application 08/082,895
271-72 (CCPA 1966). Therefore, we find that the Examiner has
failed to establish why one having
ordinary skill in the art would have been led to the claimed
invention by teachings or suggestions found in the prior art.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 and 3
through 29 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 103 or 112. Accordingly, the
Examiner's decision is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007