THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte CHE-CHIA WEI _______________ Appeal No. 95-2928 Application 07/769,1851 _______________ HEARD: Jan. 13, 1998 _______________ Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 18 through 38. Claims 1 through 17 stand withdrawn as being directed to a nonelected invention. The invention pertains to improvements in integrated circuit FET structures. More particularly, the invention employs HALO and LDD diffusions near the transistorPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007