Ex parte WEI - Page 1




                   THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                      
            today                                                                     
            (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                  
            (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                
                                                            Paper No. 31              

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                               Ex parte CHE-CHIA WEI                                  
                                   _______________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 95-2928                                   
                              Application  07/769,1851                                
                                   _______________                                    
                                HEARD: Jan. 13, 1998                                  
                                   _______________                                    
            Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative                    
            Patent Judges.                                                            
            KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                 This is a decision on appeal from the final                          
            rejection of claims 18 through 38. Claims 1 through 17                    
            stand withdrawn as being directed to a nonelected                         
            invention.                                                                
                 The invention pertains to improvements in integrated                 
            circuit FET structures.  More particularly, the invention                 
            employs HALO and LDD diffusions near the transistor                       







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007