Appeal No. 95-2950
Application No. 07/855,127
unpatentable over these references and further in view of
Lenack . 3
We refer to the various Briefs and Answers of record for
a complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by
the appellants and the examiner concerning the above noted
rejections.
OPINION
For the reasons which follow, we cannot sustain any of
the rejections presented by the examiner in this appeal.
3On this record, it is unclear why the examiner rejected
claims 94-99 first without and then with the Lenack reference.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007