THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARIA M. KAPUSCINSKI
and ROBERT T. BIGGS
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3070
Application 07/907,0781
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to
allow claims 1-6 and 9, which are the only claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
Application for patent filed July 1, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007