Ex parte KAPUSCINSKI et al. - Page 2




                Appeal No. 95-3070                                                                                                       
                Application 07/907,078                                                                                                   

                                                    The Claimed Subject Matter                                                           

                        The claimed subject matter is directed to a hydrogen backbone polymer holding two antioxidant                    

                groups.  According to applicants, the combination of the two antioxidant groups forms a synergistic                      

                antioxidant composition.  Claim 1 is representative of the claimed subject matter and is reproduced below:               

                                1.  A hydrogen backbone polymer holding two types of antioxidant groups which                            
                        form synergistic antioxidant composition comprising pendant functional groups containing                         
                        phenothiazine antioxidant and pendant functional groups containing aromatic amine                                
                        antioxidant.                                                                                                     



                                                        Prior Art References                                                             

                        The following prior art references are relied upon by the examiner in support of the rejections of               

                the claims:                                                                                                              

                        Kapuscinski et al. (Kapuscinski)                4,764,304               Aug. 16, 1988                            
                        Migdal et al. (Migdal)                  5,075,383               Dec.  24, 1991                                   
                        DeRosa et al. (DeRosa)                          5,147,569               Sep.  15, 1992                           



                                                            The Rejections                                                               

                        Claims 1, 3, 5, 6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by DeRosa.                  

                        Claims 1-6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Migdal in view                  

                of Kapuscinski.                                                                                                          

                        Claims 1-6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for                 


                                                                   2                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007