THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DOUGLAS M. RUTAN,
CURTIS E. SCOTT, JEANNINE A. WOYANSKY
and
KATHERINE L. McGINNIS
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3288
Application 08/148,0201
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application for patent filed November 4, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/806,803, filed December 6, 1991, abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/539,638, filed June 18, 1990,
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007