Appeal No. 95-3288
Application 08/148,020
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Scott in view of Aelterman,
Charles and either Davis, King or Carleton. Claims 6, 7, 9
through 11, 12, 25, 13, 15 through 17 and 27 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Scott in view of
Aelterman, Osteen, Charles and either Davis, King or Carleton.
Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Scott in view of Aelterman, Osteen, Charles
and either Davis, King or Carleton and further in view of Strok.
Claims 22, 24, 26 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Aelterman, Carleton, Osteen, Phillipp,
Charles and either Davis or King.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and
the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 5
through 7, 9 through 13, 15 through 18 and 22 through 28 under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
ANALOGOUS ART
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007