THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JEFFREY S. KING
and SILVIA M. VITERI
_____________
Appeal No.95-3292
Application 08/115,9751
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, MARTIN and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 7 and 9-12, all the claims pending
in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 3, 1993. According to Appellants, this
application is a continuation of 07/839,713, filed February 24, 1992, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/545,157, filed June 28, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007