Appeal No. 95-3388
Application 08/242,993
a conductor coupled to the second terminal of the
select gate for communicating with the memory cell.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Dhong et al. (Dhong) 4,910,709 Mar. 20,
1990
Kawai et al. (Kawai) 5,146,429 Sept. 8,
1992
Claims 1 through 3, 5 through 13, 15 through 26, 28
through 30, 32 through 37, 40 through 42 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Dhong and Appel-
lants' prior art admission found on page 1, lines 11-21, of
Appellants' specification. Claims 4, 14, 27, 31, 38 and 39
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Dhong and Appellants' prior art admission found on page
1, lines 11-21, of Appellants' specification further in view
of Kawai.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants
and the Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007