Appeal No. 95-3405
Application 08/077,505
preselected emulation program as well as an inputted additional
emulation program which are selectively used and wherein the
inputted additional emulation program is put in a back-up memory
which holds its contents after the printer is turned off, we do
not sustain the obviousness rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-8, and
10-12 over Nelson.
Claim 9 stands rejected as being obvious over Nelson. Claim
9 depends from claim 1. Because we have not sustained the
obviousness rejection of claim 1 over Nelson, we also do not
sustain the obviousness rejection of claim 9 over Nelson.
Conclusion
The anticipation rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-8 and 10-12
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 over Steeves is reversed.
The anticipation rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-8 and 10-12
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 over Christopher is reversed.
The anticipation rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-8 and 10-12
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 over Nelson is reversed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5-12 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 over Steeves is reversed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 1, 3 and 5-12 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 over Christopher is reversed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 1, 3, and 5-12 under 35
14
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007