Appeal No. 95-3517
Application 08/203,729
can be used by the processor, thereby
extending the address range of the physical
RAM.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Christian et al. 4,403,288 Sep. 06, 1983
V. Carl Hamacher, "Computer Organization", second edition
published by McGraw-Hill Company, 1984, pp. 214-216 & 313-317.
Claims 1, 5, 9, 13 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102 as being anticipated by Hamacher, sections 8.7 and 8.8.
Claims 3, 11, 15 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Hamacher, sections 8.7 and 8.8, in view
of Christian. Claims 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Hamacher, sections 8.7 and 8.8, in view of Christian and further
in view of Hamacher, section 6.6.2.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 5, 9, 13 and
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007