THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SSUJAN HOU AND
LAM F. WONG
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3583
Application 08/185,2941
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed January 24, 1994. According
to applicants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/859,746, filed March 30, 1992, which is abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007