THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOM R. HAYNES
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3744
Application 08/084,8381
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's rejection of
claims 1-4, 6-13 and 15-18, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for two-dimensionally scrolling
data in the client area of a window on the user interface of a data processing system.
Conventionally in a data processing system, scrolling of data within a window is performed by
1Application for patent filed June 29, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007