Ex parte HAYNES - Page 2




                    Appeal No. 95-3744                                                                                                                                     
                    Application 08/084,838                                                                                                                                 


                    scrolling separately in a horizontal direction or a vertical direction on a display screen.  The                                                       
                    instant invention provides an object as part of the window which can be dragged in any direction                                                       
                    and the contents of the window will be scrolled in that direction.                                                                                     
                    Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                                                       
                              1.  A method of two-dimensionally scrolling data in a client area of a window on a user                                                      
                    interface of a data processing system, comprising the steps of:                                                                                        
                              a) providing an object included as a part of said window, said object occupying a home                                                       
                    position;                                                                                                                                              
                              b) allowing a user to move said object in a composite direction from said home position,                                                     
                    said composite direction comprising a first directional component and a second directional                                                             
                    component, said second directional component being orthogonal to said first directional                                                                
                    component; and                                                                                                                                         
                              c) scrolling said data in said client area in said composite direction.                                                                      
                    The examiner cites the following references in the examiner’s answer:                                                                                  
                    Yanker                                  5,075,673                               Dec. 24, 1991                                                          
                    Steele et al. (Steele)                  5,169,342                               Dec. 08, 1992                                                          
                    Meier et al. (Meier)                         5,196,838                               Mar. 23, 1993                                                     
                    Paal et al. (Paal)                             5,263,134                                Nov. 16, 19932                                                                                                                                 
                    (filed July 30, 1992)                                                                                                                                  
                    Apple (Canadian Patent)                2,059,893                                Sep. 13, 1992                                                          
                    Microsoft® Windows  User’s Guide (Windows), copyright 1990-1992, pages 386-388.                                                                        
                                                 TM                                                                                                                        



                              2Although Paal is listed in the examiner’s answer as prior art relied upon, none of the                                                      
                    rejections formulated by the examiner makes reference to Paal in the statement of the rejection or                                                     
                    in the analysis.  We will have further comments on Paal at the end of this decision.                                                                   
                                                                                    2                                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007