Ex parte KONO - Page 10




          Appeal No. 95-3908                                                          
          Application No. 07/890,350                                                  

          additional reference to Krenz provides for the indicated                    
          deficiencies of Dunn and Hattori.  Accordingly, we will not                 
          sustain the rejection of claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                     
               We have not sustained any of the rejections under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 103 because, based on the evidence before us, the                  
          examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of                      
          obviousness.                                                                
               The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                   
                                      REVERSED                                        





          Kenneth W. Hairston             )                                           
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                      
                    )                                                                 
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
                         Errol A. Krass                  ) BOARD OF                   
          PATENT                                                                      
                         Administrative Patent Judge     )   APPEALS AND              
                                                  )  INTERFERENCES                    
                                                  )                                   
                                                  )                                   
               Jerry Smith                        )                                   
                         Administrative Patent Judge     )                            





                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007