THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DAMODAR M. PAI,
WILLIAM W. LIMBURG,
JOHN F. YANUS,
and PAUL J. DE FEO
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3947
Application 07/812,5301
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 8-10, 13, 14, 17 and
18. Claims 19-36, which are the only other claims remaining in the application, stand withdrawn
from consideration by the examiner as being directed toward a nonelected invention.
THE INVENTION
1Application for patent filed December 20, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007