THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN A. PAZIK
__________
Appeal No. 95-4002
Application 08/081,8581
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-22, all the
claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed June 22, 1993. According to the applicant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/761,714, filed September 17, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007