Appeal No. 95-4002 Application 08/081,858 The particular mounting orientation [of the tank] . . . would have been an obvious matter of engineering design choice determined by the space available in the particular vehicle. Attention is directed to Durrett, Jr. et. al., fig. 3 which discloses a pocket orientation that is transverse to the long axis of the tank. To have employed such teaching with a single pocket would have been obvoius [sic, obvious] to one of ordinary skill in the art in light of the cost savings to be realized. It is widely accepted in the field to employ baffles that restrict the flow of fluids. These baffles are placed across the path of the fluid flow. [answer, page 4] We cannot accept this position. First, it is not clear that providing the Figure 3 embodiment of Durrett with only a single pocket would result in any significant cost savings. Second, the examiner has not explained, and it is not clear to us, why the skilled artisan would carry out such a modification of the Figure 3 embodiment in a way that would necessarily result in the tank of claim 8. In this regard, Durrett’s Figure 1 embodiment is a “single pocket” tank of the type generally proposed by the examiner, yet it is clearly does not correspond to that which is called for in claim 8. Also, when only two modular containers of Durrett’s Figure 5 embodiment are employed, a “single pocket” container results, however, it too clearly does not correspond to that which is called for in claim 8. The mere fact that the prior art structure could be modified in a manner which would result in the claimed subject does not make such a modification obvious unless the prior art suggests the desirability of doing so. In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984). In the present instance, we fail to perceive any teaching, suggestion or incentive in Durrett which would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the fuel tank thereof in a manner which would result 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007