Appeal No. 95-4119
Application 08/155,877
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4,
6, 7 and 10. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining
in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a method of using a
universal waving die. An understanding of the method can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 6, a copy of which
appears in the appendix to appellant’s brief (Paper No. 9).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied
the documents listed below:
Wuerfel Re 17,785 Aug. 26, 1930
Aktiebolaget 888,636 Jan. 31, 1962
(Great Britain)
Sipeykin et al. (Oil) 1,523,218 Nov. 23, 1989
(U.S.S.R.)2
2Our understanding of this document is derived from a
reading of a translation thereof prepared in the United States
Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the translation is
appended to this opinion.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007