Appeal No. 95-4119
Application 08/155,877
The following rejections are before us for review.3
Claims 4, 6, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Oil in view of Aktiebolaget.
Claims 4, 6, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Wuerfel in view of Oil and
Aktiebolaget.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
(Paper No. 10), while the complete statement of appellant’s
argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 9).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the obviousness issues
raised in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully
considered appellant’s specification and claims, the applied
teachings, and the respective viewpoints of appellant and the4
3A final rejection of appellant’s claims under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, was withdrawn by the examiner (answer,
page 2).
4In our evaluation of the applied teachings, we have
considered all of the disclosure of each teaching for what it
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007