Appeal No. 95-4152
Application 08/042,044
Claims 10-12, 19-21, and 24 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hanson and Moss.
Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hanson, Coombs, and Rodway.
Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hanson, Hamilton, and Eckstein.
We refer to the Office action entered May 5, 1994 (Paper
No. 8) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 14) (pages
referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the examiner's
position and to the Brief (Paper No. 13) (pages referred to as
"Br__") (pages referred to as "RBr__") for appellants'
position.
OPINION
Information Disclosure Statement
The Information Disclosure Statement received
April 13, 1998, has not been considered by the examiner. It
is noted that two documents, Fire Engineering, March 1993,
page 35, and Firehouse, March 1993, page 87, show an infrared
imaging system by Cairns & Brother, Inc., the assignee of the
present application, which has a helmet mounted infrared
sensor camera and display. It is assumed that those documents
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007