THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION This opinion (1) was not written for publication and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WILLIAM K. BODIN and DALE R. WHITFIELD ____________ Appeal No. 95-4172 Application 08/040,6981 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL BACKGROUND This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-3 and 8, the only pending claims. We reverse. The subject matter of the invention is a system and method for simultaneous high-resolution display for multiple virtual applications. Claim 8 is representative of the claims on appeal, which stand or fall together (emphasis added): 1 Attorney docket no. BC9-93-008.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007