Appeal No. 95-4207
Application 08/073,442
synchronization among a plurality of locations, Noreen does
not teach of utilizing the time synchronization capability of
such satellites. On the other hand, Noreen only utilizes a
GPS system for location and position determining capabilities
of the remote, mobile user terminals 107 and 109.
Overall then, since we cannot agree with the examiner’s
position that independent claims 1 and 19 are anticipated by
Noreen and that claims 10 and 11 would have been obvious over
this reference, we reverse the rejection of the remaining,
dependent claims listed in each separately stated rejection by
the examiner. Since Pommier and Kotzin do not respectively
cure the deficiencies already noted in Noreen, the
respectively stated
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007