THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID E. BOERSTLER, EDWARD B. EICHELBERGER,
GARY T. HENDRICKSON and CHARLES B. WINN
____________
Appeal No. 95-4531
Application No. 07/939,8921
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 26. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 13),2
claims 5, 17, 21, 22, and 26 were amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a level shift circuit for
a logic circuit that translates a first voltage level binary
1Application for patent filed September 1, 1992.
2As indicated in the Advisory Action (paper number 14), the
amendment had the effect of overcoming the indefiniteness
rejection of claims 17 through 21.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007