Appeal No. 95-4629
Application 07/831,953
the specification as filed the "second aspect" of the
invention it is stated at lines 14 through 18 that "when the
position pointed by the coordinate input device is out of the
tolerance range of the protrusion of the window, the display
position is corrected or not corrected depending on the
condition.” This aspect is more specifically described at
page 22, lines 16 to 21 where it is stated that "since the
display position is corrected or not corrected on the basis of
the condition when the display position designated lies
outside of the tolerance range, the user can operate the
window display apparatus in accordance with the user's own
intention and the window display apparatus can be operated
more conveniently."
When the subject matter of the last two paragraphs of
this discussion have been considered against the claimed
invention, it is noted that there is no statement in
independent claim 1 or 5 as to any correction being
automatically effected and in any manner such as that the
window image would be wholly displayed within the display
screen or substantially centered. Moreover, at least as to
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007