Ex parte WALDER - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 95-4669                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/044,674                                                                                                                 


                 to inhibit or reduce bacterial growth during its use in a living body.  Claim 1 is                                                     
                 illustrative and reads as follows:                                                                                                     
                          1.       An anti-infective medical article comprising a hydrophilic polymer having                                            
                 an insoluble silver salt bulk distributed therein, said polymer having a water absorption                                              
                 of 5% or more by weight.                                                                                                               
                          The references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                                           
                 obviousness are:                                                                                                                       
                 Pratt et al.  (Pratt)                                   4,849,223                              Jul.   18, 1989                         
                 Laurin et al. (Laurin)                          PCT/US83/01404                       Sep. 15, 1983                                     
                 Allan S. Hoffman, Synthetic Polymeric Biomaterials, in Polymeric Materials and Artificial                                              
                 Organs, 13-29 (Charles G. Gebelein, ed., 1983).                                                                                        
                          The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:                                                         
                          (a) claims 1-5 as being unpatentable over Laurin in view of Hoffman; and                                                      
                          (b) claim 6 as being unpatentable over Laurin in view of Hoffman and further in                                               
                 view of Pratt.                                                                                                                         
                          Reference is made to appellant’s brief (Paper No. 13) and to the examiner’s                                                   
                 answer (Paper No. 14) for the respective positions of appellant and the examiner with                                                  
                 regard to the merits of these rejections.                                                                                              
                          Laurin, the examiner’s primary reference, pertains to “compositions useful in                                                 
                 making medical devices and useful in providing antimicrobial coatings on medical                                                       
                 devices” (page 1).  As explained on page 3, Laurin’s coating                                                                           

                          is prepared by mixing a suitable resin and a compound of a physiological,                                                     
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007