Ex parte RHODES et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 95-4824                                                                                   
             Application 07/966,163                                                                               


                                                THE INVENTION                                                     
                    Appellants claim a bismuth-containing complex which,                                          
             appellants state, is useful for treating conditions of the                                           
             alimentary canal (specification, page 1, lines 6-9).  A method                                       
             for making the complex also is claimed.  Claims 1 and 41 are                                         
             illustrative and read as follows:                                                                    
                    1.    A water soluble complex of bismuth with a polyacrylate.                                 
                    41. A process for the preparation of a water-soluble                                          
             complex of bismuth and a polyacrylate comprising reacting a                                          
             bismuth-containing compound with a polyacrylate in a liquid                                          
             phase.                                                                                               
                                               THE REFERENCES                                                     
             Coveney et al. (Coveney)          4,940,695        Jul. 10, 1990                                     
             Borody                            5,196,205        Mar. 23, 1993                                     
             (PCT filing date Sept. 29, 1988)                                                                     
             Lloyd-Jones et al. (Lloyd-Jones)  2,220,855         Jan. 24, 1990                                    
                    (United Kingdom patent application)                                                           
                                               THE REJECTIONS                                                     
                    Claims 1-3, 29-39 and 41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                       
             § 103 as being unpatentable over Coveney in view of Lloyd-Jones.                                     
             Claims 42-44 and 46-48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                       
             being unpatentable over Borody in view of Lloyd-Jones.                                               






                                                       -2-2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007