THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DANIEL J. HALLORAN, KENNETH A. KASPRZAK
and PATRICIA D. HERTER
__________
Appeal No. 95-4881
Application 08/254,8521
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
7-11 which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed June 06, 1994. According to the appellants, the application is a
division of Application 07/972,342, filed November 06, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007