Ex parte HALLORAN et al. - Page 5

                   Appeal No. 95-4881                                                                                                                               
                   Application 08/254,852                                                                                                                           


                   polyoxyalkylene polymers in the antiperspirant composition.  In view of the fact that Keil does not teach                                        

                   or suggest that his polydiorganosiloxane-polyoxyalkylene polymers can be used as surfactants or in hair                                          

                   conditioning compositions, we find no basis upon which the examiner can reach his conclusion of                                                  

                   obviousness.  For the foregoing reasons, the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                           

                   over the combined teachings of Ansher-Jackson, Bolich and Keil is reversed.                                                                      

                                                                         REVERSED                                                                                   







                                                CAMERON WEIFFENBACH                                       )                                                         
                                                Administrative Patent Judge                         )                                                               
                                                                                                          )                                                         
                                                                                                          )                                                         
                                                                                                          ) BOARD OF PATENT                                         
                                                CHUNG K. PAK                                              )                                                         
                                                Administrative Patent Judge              )   APPEALS AND                                                            
                                                                                                          )                                                         
                                                                                                          ) INTERFERENCES                                           
                                                                                                          )                                                         
                                                THOMAS A. WALTZ                                           )                                                         
                                                Administrative Patent Judge                         )                                                               







                                                                                 5                                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007