THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ISMAEL Z. AMINI, TZE-WING KEUNG and
ANDRES M. MOLINA
____________
Appeal No. 95-4913
Application No. 07/962,4251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and FLEMING , Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3
through 6 and 8 through 10. In an Amendment After Final (paper2
number 7), claims 1 and 6 were amended.
1Application for patent filed October 16, 1992.
2As indicated in the Advisory Action (paper number 8), the
amendment to claims 1 and 6 had the effect of overcoming the
indefiniteness rejection of claims 1, 3 through 6 and 8
through 10.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007