THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD J. POKORNY
__________
Appeal No. 95-4934
Application 07/908,6501
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed July 2, 1992. According1
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/694,448 filed May 1, 1991, now abandoned, which
is a reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 4,927,556 issued May 22,
1990, based on Application 07/260,172 filed October 20, 1988,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/164,231
filed March 18, 1988, now abandoned, which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/058,162 filed June 4, 1987, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007