THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MASSIMO CALANCHI, MARCO ZEMA, GABRIELE BRUNETTI and
ENZO GIORGETTI
____________
Appeal No. 95-4962
Application No. 07/972,6601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, JOHN D. SMITH and PAK, Administrative
Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Calanchi et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 7 through 11, which
are all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed November 6, 1992.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/644,062, filed January 22, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007