nor would have suggested, the claimed two membranes capable of releasing a drug in the claimed rate. NEW REJECTION UNDER § 1.196(b) Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), the following new ground of rejection is entered against claims 1, 3, 7 and 9 through 11. Claims 1, 3, 7 and 9 through 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the disclosure of the Eichel reference. The Eichel reference describes a “sustained-release pharmaceutical preparation comprising an admixture of uncoated and/or single walled water soluble drug, such as aspirin, and dual walled coated drug (emphasis supplied).” See abstract. The dual wall structure has an inner wall microencapsular control coating and an outer wall enteric coating. Id.; see also page 3, lines 15-18. “The inner wall microencapsular control coating is preferably selected from the group consisting of ethyl cellulose, hydroxy propyl cellulose and carboxy methyl cellulose.” See page 3, lines 27-28. The preferred outer wall enteric coating is cellulose acetate phthalate which dissolves at pH 7.5 as found in the intestine. See page 3, lines 31-34. “Other enteric coatings may be used as long as they do not readily dissolve or disperse in the 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007