THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MAREIKE KLEE, WOLFGANG BRAND and HENRICUS VAN HAL
____________
Appeal No. 95-4963
Application No. 08/151,5891
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, JOHN D. SMITH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 19, 21 through 25 and 27 through 37, which
are all of the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed November 12, 1993.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/927,702, filed August 7, 1992, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007