Appeal No. 95-5039
Application 07/979,018
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 38
through 42. Claims 2, 4 through 6, 8, 14, 16 through 18, 25, 27,
28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, and 51 through 60, the only other claims
remaining in the application, are considered by the examiner to
be allowable over the prior art of record (Paper No. 10, page 2).
Appellant’s invention pertains to an identification
card. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a
reading of exemplary claim 38 as it appears in the application
file (pages 6 and 7 of Paper No. 6).
The following rejection is the sole rejection before us
for review.
Claims 38 through 42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response
to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007