Ex parte MARCUS - Page 4




          Appeal No. 95-5039                                                          
          Application 07/979,018                                                      



                    Under the statutory provision at issue, claims are                
          required to particularly point out and distinctly claim the                 


          subject matter which is regarded as the invention.  In other                
          words, the metes and bounds of the claimed invention must be                
          determinable.                                                               


                    In the present case, we share appellant’s point of view           
          to the effect that the claims would reasonably apprise those                
          skilled in the art as to the metes and bounds of the subject                
          matter being claimed.                                                       


                    Like appellant, we readily understand that the claimed            
          identification card comprises, inter alia, an image of an object            
          or other entity and a two dimensional barcode representation,               
          which image and barcode representation are clearly defined                  
          aspects of the claimed card.                                                


                    Additionally, we consider the claimed recitation of “an           
          (sic, a) two dimensional barcode representation of an encrypted             
          signal comprising a compressed representation of said image” to             
          be definite in meaning, when read in light of the underlying dis-           
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007