Appeal No. 95-5039 Application 07/979,018 Under the statutory provision at issue, claims are required to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which is regarded as the invention. In other words, the metes and bounds of the claimed invention must be determinable. In the present case, we share appellant’s point of view to the effect that the claims would reasonably apprise those skilled in the art as to the metes and bounds of the subject matter being claimed. Like appellant, we readily understand that the claimed identification card comprises, inter alia, an image of an object or other entity and a two dimensional barcode representation, which image and barcode representation are clearly defined aspects of the claimed card. Additionally, we consider the claimed recitation of “an (sic, a) two dimensional barcode representation of an encrypted signal comprising a compressed representation of said image” to be definite in meaning, when read in light of the underlying dis- 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007