Appeal No. 95-5110 Application 07/918,954 shown in Tsuzuki's Figure 1 because the distance between the n type layer and the bottom of the trench depends upon the depth of the trench and the breakdown voltage of the device. Appellants argue on pages 3-5 of the brief that one of ordinary skill in the art would not have a reason to use the Katou trench in the Tsuzuki transistor because Tsuzuki is concerned with providing an arbitrary avalanche breakdown voltage at the bottom of the deep body P region in order to prevent punch-through while in contrast Katou is concerned with decreasing the concentration of an electric field and increasing dielectric resistance. Furthermore, on pages 2 and 3 of the reply brief, Appellants argue that the Examiner has failed to show a suggestion or reason that if the trench was employed in the Tsuzuki transistor that the trench would only extend into the N- region 4. Upon a closer reading of the reference, we fail to find that the prior art provides any evidence that suggests the Examiner's modification. The Federal Circuit states that "[t]he mere fact that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by the Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007