THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANDREW G. PAPAY
__________
Appeal No. 96-0306
Application 07/709,3691
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1
through 25 and 33 through 48. The only other claims in the2
1Application for patent filed June 3, 1991.
2We observe that the claim amendment filed subsequent to
the final rejection on August 22, 1994 (Paper No. 13) has not
been clerically entered notwithstanding the examiner's
authorization thereof in the advisory action mailed August 26,
1994 (Paper No. 14).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007