Appeal No. 96-0306 Application No. 07/709,369 compositions, albeit for a different purpose, is inadequate to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. In short, the primary references to White and Jordan do not teach and would not have suggested compositions and methods of the type here claimed which relate to an automatic transmission fluid or a wet brake fluid or a friction-dependent lubricant and which employs certain polyols in certain amounts in order to increase dynamic and/or static coefficients of friction. Moreover, these deficiencies of White and Jordan are not remedied by the disclosure of Papay. It follows that we cannot sustain any of the above noted § 103 rejections advanced by the examiner on this appeal. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED Bradley R. Garris ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) Chung K. Pak ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Charles F. Warren ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Mr. Dennis H. Rainear Patent and Trademark Division Ethyl Corporation 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007