Ex parte FINLEY et al. - Page 9




              Appeal No. 96-0317                                                                                         
              Application 08/042,185                                                                                     


              or to arc spray a layer of solder onto the metal layer, we do not sustain the rejection of                 
              claims 8, 9 and 18-20.                                                                                     

                                                      DECISION                                                           

                     The rejection of claims 1-7, 10, and 12-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over appellants’                   
              acknowledged prior art in view of Leas, Lindmayer ‘391 or Lindmayer ‘812, and Ballard, is                  
              affirmed.  The rejection of claims 8, 9 and 18-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over these                         
              references is reversed.                                                                                    

























                                                           9                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007