THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALFRED J. KOLB,
ROY L. MANNS and KENNETH E. NEUMANN
____________
Appeal No. 96-0401
Application No. 08/127,3041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-8, 10-12, 14-21, 32 and 33. Claims 22-
31 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR §
1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claims 9
and 13 have been canceled. The appellants have confined the
appeal to only claims 1-8, 10-12, 14, 15, 32 and 33 (brief, p.
2). Consequently, the appeal is dismissed with respect to
1Application for patent filed September 27, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007