THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EUGENE K. ACHTER, DIRK APPEL, DAVID H. FINE,
FREEMAN W. FRAIM and STEPHEN J. MACDONALD
________________
Appeal No. 96-0760
Application No. 08/051,2101
________________
HEARD: November 3, 1998
________________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, KIMLIN and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed April 22, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 07/890,863, filed June 1, 1992, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,352,611, issued October 4, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007