Ex parte SHAH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1115                                                          
          Application 07/917,098                                                      




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 1 to 12, which constitute all the                 
          claims in the application.                                                  
               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                            
               1.  A method of communicating between first and second                 
          nodes connected by a serial link, the method comprising the                 
          steps of:                                                                   
               transmitting data between said nodes in the form of                    
          packets, each packet comprising a plurality of predefined                   
          fields, each field consisting of one or more multibit data                  
          frames; and                                                                 
               controlling the flow of the data packets by means of                   
          multiple bit control frames having the same bit length as the               
          data frames and being distinguishable from the data frames,                 
          the control frames being transmissible independently of the                 
          data packets.                                                               

               The following references are relied by the examiner:                   
          Tooley et al. (Tooley)        3,979,719           Sep.  7, 1976             
          Thorne                        5,027,349           Jun. 25, 1991             

               Claims 1 to 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As               
          evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Tooley in                 
          view of Thorne.  Rather than repeat the positions of the                    


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007