Appeal No. 96-1115 Application 07/917,098 Thorne may teach that control fields may be of variable length as needed does not necessarily argue or teach the desirability of modifying another data structure. Essentially, there is no other reason advocated by the examiner to modify Tooley and we are aware of none. We are also persuaded by appellants' argument at the bottom of page 6 and at the bottom of page 7 of the brief that independent claims 1 and 9 patentably distinguish over the teachings and showings in Tooley because the claimed control frames rather than an entire control block or packet as taught by Tooley and by the Tooley-Thorne combination are utilized to control the flow of data packets. At page 4 of the answer the examiner analogizes the data or text blocks of Tooley to the claimed data packets. In one sense then it does take within Tooley's teachings an entire data block length in the form of a response message format to transmit a response message comprising an ACK or a NAK or a RSP message. Tooley does not teach that a lesser number of bits or identifiable groups of bits within any of his blocks may be construed as a control "frame" having the same bit length as a data or text portion 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007