Appeal No. 96-1119
Application 07/690,176
12, 14 and 16. Claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 had been
previously cancelled. A first amendment after final rejection
was filed on October 11, 1994 but was denied entry by the
examiner [Paper No. 15]. A second amendment after final
rejection was filed on August 21, 1995 and was entered by the
examiner. This amendment cancelled claims 10, 12, 14 and 16.
A third amendment after final rejection was filed concurrently
with the reply brief on October 6, 1995. This amendment
amended claims 2, 4, 6 and 8 and was marked “Enter this
amendment” by the examiner, and the amendment has been
entered. As a result of the above amendments, this appeal is
directed to the rejections of claims 2, 4, 6 and 8, which
constitute all the claims remaining in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method and
apparatus for developing application software which is to be
operated on multiple processors.
Representative claim 2 is reproduced as follows:
2. A method for multiple software development,
comprising:
(a) a host computer directly monitoring at least one
master processor;
(b) the host computer indirectly monitoring a slave
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007