Appeal No. 96-1246
Application No. 08/205,812
digital signal into said processor means" as recited in
Appellants'
claim 17. Therefore, we will not sustain the Examiner's
rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner
rejecting claims 1, 2, and 12 through 15 and 17 through 20 is
reversed.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007