Ex parte FUJIOKA et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                 
          (1)  was not written for publication in a law journal and                   
          (2)  is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 
                                                           Paper No. 23              
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte YOSHIHISA FUJIOKA                               
                                 and HIROTOMO MUKAI                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 96-1366                                   
                               Application 08/105,6171                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                HEARD: March 5, 1998                                  
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s               
          final rejection of claim 3.  Claims 1 and 2 have been                       




          1  Application for patent filed August 13, 1993.                            

                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007