THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RIFAT A.M. HIKMET,
WILLEM G. OPHEY and JOSEPHUS J.M. BRAAT
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1368
Application 08/080,8911
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MARTIN, BARRETT, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-16. The examiner's 2
Application for patent filed June 22, 1993.1
Final Office action, paper No. 9.2
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007